Maternal Healthcare Service Utilization in Low and Middle Income Countries: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.55927/f20dsr36Keywords:
Maternal Healthcare, Antenatal Care, Skilled Birth Attendance, Institutional Delivery, Postnatal CareAbstract
Maternal mortality remains a critical public health challenge in low and middle income countries (LMICs), where 95% of global maternal deaths occur. Quality maternal healthcare services are essential for reducing preventable mortality and morbidity. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence of maternal healthcare utilization indicators and identify key determinants influencing service uptake in LMICs. Following PRISMA 2020 guidelines, we searched PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library for studies published between 2015 and 2024. The review was prospectively registered with PROSPERO (CRD42024612847). Random-effects meta-analysis estimated pooled prevalence for antenatal care (ANC), skilled birth attendance (SBA), institutional delivery (ID), and postnatal care (PNC). Quality was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale adapted for cross-sectional studies (Hoy et al., 2012). We included 145 studies from 89 LMICs involving over 2.8 million women. Pooled prevalence was 85.0% (95% CI: 82.3–87.4%) for at least one ANC visit, 50.8% (95% CI: 47.2–54.4%) for four ANC visits, 65.6% (95% CI: 62.1–69.0%) for SBA, 66.9% (95% CI: 63.4–70.3%) for ID, and 48.9% (95% CI: 45.3–52.5%) for PNC. Prediction intervals were wide across all indicators, reflecting genuine between-study variability (I² > 95%). Maternal education (OR = 3.42), household wealth (OR = 4.67), and urban residence (OR = 2.87) were strong positive predictors, while distance to facilities and poor service quality were significant barriers. Despite progress in initial ANC contact, critical gaps persist in comprehensive antenatal care and postnatal services
References
Alkema, L., Chou, D., Hogan, D., Zhang, S., Moller, A. B., Gemmill, A., ... & Say, L. (2016). Global, regional, and national levels and trends in maternal mortality between 1990 and 2015, with scenario-based projections to 2030: A systematic analysis by the UN Maternal Mortality Estimation Inter-Agency Group. The Lancet, 387(10017), 462–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(15)00838-7
Andersen, R. M., & Davidson, P. L. (2014). Improving access to care in America: Individual and contextual indicators. In R. M. Andersen, T. H. Rice, & G. F. Kominski (Eds.), Changing the U.S. health care system: Key issues in health services policy and management (4th ed., pp. 3–31). Jossey-Bass.
Barendregt, J. J., Doi, S. A., Lee, Y. Y., Norman, R. E., & Vos, T. (2013). Meta-analysis of prevalence. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health, 67(11), 974–978. https://doi.org/10.1136/jech-2013-203104
Benova, L., Tunçalp, Ö., Moran, A. C., & Campbell, O. M. (2018). Not just a number: Examining coverage and content of antenatal care in low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Global Health, 3(2), e000779. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjgh-2018-000779
Bohren, M. A., Mehrtash, H., Fawole, B., Maung, T. M., Balde, M. D., Maya, E., ... & Tunçalp, Ö. (2019). How women are treated during facility-based childbirth in four countries: A cross-sectional study with labour observations and community-based surveys. The Lancet, 394(10210), 1750–1763. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)31992-0
Campbell, O. M., Calvert, C., Testa, A., Strehlow, M., Benova, L., Keyes, E., ... & Bailey, P. (2016). The scale, scope, coverage, and capability of childbirth care. The Lancet, 388(10056), 2193–2208. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(16)31528-8
Gabrysch, S., & Campbell, O. M. (2009). Still too far to walk: Literature review of the determinants of delivery service use. BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, 9(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2393-9-34
Higgins, J. P., Thompson, S. G., Deeks, J. J., & Altman, D. G. (2003). Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ, 327(7414), 557–560. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7414.557
Hoy, D., Brooks, P., Woolf, A., Blyth, F., March, L., Bain, C., ... & Buchbinder, R. (2012). Assessing risk of bias in prevalence studies: Modification of an existing tool and evidence of interrater agreement. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 65(9), 934–939. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.11.014
Kruk, M. E., Gage, A. D., Arsenault, C., Jordan, K., Leslie, H. H., Roder-DeWan, S., ... & Pate, M. (2018). High-quality health systems in the Sustainable Development Goals era: Time for a revolution. The Lancet Global Health, 6(11), e1196–e1252. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30386-3
Marmot, M., Friel, S., Bell, R., Houweling, T. A., Taylor, S., & Commission on Social Determinants of Health. (2008). Closing the gap in a generation: Health equity through action on the social determinants of health. The Lancet, 372(9650), 1661–1669. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(08)61690-6
Moller, A. B., Petzold, M., Chou, D., & Say, L. (2017). Early antenatal care visit: A systematic analysis of regional and global levels and trends of coverage from 1990 to 2013. The Lancet Global Health, 5(10), e977–e983. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(17)30325-X
Moyer, C. A., & Mustafa, A. (2013). Drivers and deterrents of facility delivery in sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. Reproductive Health, 10(1), 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/1742-4755-10-40
Page, M. J., McKenzie, J. E., Bossuyt, P. M., Boutron, I., Hoffmann, T. C., Mulrow, C. D., ... & Moher, D. (2021). The PRISMA 2020 statement: An updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ, 372, n71. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.n71
Perry, H. B., Zulliger, R., & Rogers, M. M. (2014). Community health workers in low-, middle-, and high-income countries: An overview of their history, recent evolution, and current effectiveness. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 399–421. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182354
Say, L., Chou, D., Gemmill, A., Tunçalp, Ö., Moller, A. B., Daniels, J., ... & Alkema, L. (2014). Global causes of maternal death: A WHO systematic analysis. The Lancet Global Health, 2(6), e323–e333. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X
Stanton, C. K., Rawlins, B., Drake, M., Dos Anjos, M., Cantor, D., Chongo, L., ... & Ricca, J. (2013). Measuring coverage in MNCH: Testing the validity of women’s self-report of key maternal and newborn health interventions during the peripartum period in Mozambique. PLOS ONE, 8(5), e60694. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060694
Tunçalp, Ö., Were, W. M., MacLennan, C., Oladapo, O. T., Gülmezoglu, A. M., Bahl, R., ... & Bustreo, F. (2015). Quality of care for pregnant women and newborns: The WHO vision. BJOG: An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, 122(8), 1045–1049. https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13451
United Nations. (2023). The Sustainable Development Goals Report 2023: Special edition. United Nations Publications. https://unstats.un.org/sdgs/report/2023/
World Bank. (2024). World Bank country and lending groups. https://datahelpdesk.worldbank.org/knowledgebase/articles/906519
World Health Organization. (2016). WHO recommendations on antenatal care for a positive pregnancy experience. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241549912
World Health Organization. (2018). WHO recommendations: Intrapartum care for a positive childbirth experience. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550215
World Health Organization, United Nations Children’s Fund, United Nations Population Fund, World Bank Group, & United Nations Population Division. (2023). Trends in maternal mortality 2000 to 2020: Estimates by WHO, UNICEF, UNFPA, World Bank Group and UNDESA/Population Division. World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240068759
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Ririt Yuliarti Taha, Putri Rosanti Caesaria, Fajar Kurniawan (Author)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
