Changes in Voters’ Perspectives in Selecting Leaders in the Era of Regional Autonomy in Kendari City

Authors

  • Darmin Tuwu Social Welfare Halu Oleo University, Kendari Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.55927/66wvtn37

Keywords:

Kendari City, Local Democracy, Local Executive Elections, Regional Autonomy, Voter Perspectives

Abstract

This study examines the transformation of voters’ perspectives in local executive elections in the era of regional autonomy, using Kendari City, Southeast Sulawesi Province, as a case study during the 2025–2030 election period. The research is grounded in the context of Indonesia’s decentralization, which has reshaped local political competition and voter–candidate interactions. Employing a qualitative research design, the study integrates qualitative surveys, in-depth interviews, focus group discussions (FGDs), and document analysis. A total of 30 informants were purposively selected from key stakeholder groups, including voters, election management officials (KPU), local government representatives, civil society organizations, and political party actors. The findings reveal that voters’ perspectives in Kendari are undergoing a dynamic transformation rather than a linear shift toward performance-based voting. While many voters increasingly emphasize candidates’ track records, public service delivery, and responsiveness, social proximity, personal familiarity, and pragmatic considerations continue to influence electoral preferences. The study also identifies growing public protest and rejection of candidates perceived as non–pro-people, reflecting heightened democratic awareness and the role of civil society in fostering critical engagement. However, such protest remains unevenly distributed across socio-economic groups

References

Allen, N. W. (2015). Clientelism and the personal vote in Indonesia. Electoral Studies, 37, 73–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2014.10.005

Aminah, S. (2020). The evaluation of regional head election: Developing synergy of regional autonomy and regional head election. Jurnal Bina Praja, 12(2), 137–151. https://doi.org/10.21787/jbp.12.2020.137-151

Aminah, S., Apriani, T., Pranasari, M. A., Indarti, D. M., & Herlina, M. (2020). The high political costs in local head election (Case study in Indonesia). European Journal of Molecular & Clinical Medicine, 7(11), 653-682.

Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2016). Electoral dynamics in Indonesia: Money politics, patronage and clientelism at the grassroots. Singapore: NUS Press.

Auyero, J. (2001). Poor people’s politics: Peronist survival networks and the legacy of Evita. Durham: Duke University Press.

Bake, J. (2024). The Values Of Democracy In The Implementation Local Political Agenda In Kendari.

Banducci, S. A., & Karp, J. A. (2003). How elections change the way citizens view the political system: Campaigns, media effects and electoral outcomes in comparative perspective. British Journal of Political Science, 33(3), 443-467.

Berenschot, W. (2019). Explaining regional variation in local governance: Clientelism, elite capture, and the quality of government in Indonesia. World Development, 114, 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.09.022

Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. https://doi.org/10.3316/QRJ0902027

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Crook, R. C., & Manor, J. (1998). Democracy and decentralisation in South Asia and West Africa. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Dalton, R. J., Farrell, D. M., & McAllister, I. (2011). Political parties and democratic linkage: How parties organize democracy. Oxford University Press.

Denzin, N. K. (2012). Triangulation 2.0. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 6(2), 80–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186

Devas, N., & Grant, U. (2003). Local government decision‐making—citizen participation and local accountability: some evidence from Kenya and Uganda. Public Administration and Development: The International Journal of Management Research and Practice, 23(4), 307-316.

Evans, M. (2014). Democracy, legitimacy and local government electoral reform. Local Government Studies, 40(1), 41-63.

Fiorina, M. P. (1981). Retrospective voting in American national elections. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Fitrani, F., Hofman, B., & Kaiser, K. (2005). Unity in diversity? The creation of new local governments in a decentralising Indonesia. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 41(1), 57–79. https://doi.org/10.1080/00074910500072690

Fung, A. (2006). Varieties of participation in complex governance. Public Administration Review, 66(s1), 66–75.

Grindle, M. S. (2007). Going local: Decentralization, democratization, and the promise of good governance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Hadiz, V. R. (2004). Decentralization and democracy in Indonesia: A critique of neo‐institutionalist perspectives. Development and change, 35(4), 697-718.

Hickey, S., & Mohan, G. (2004). Participation: From tyranny to transformation. London: Zed Books.

Hoesein, Z. A., Arifudin, & Rahayu, S. D. (2022). The Effectiveness of Decentralization Policy in Local Government Administration. Jurnal Kita, 9(1), 242–259.

Jansen, H. (2010). The logic of qualitative survey research and its position in the field of social research methods. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung/ Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 11(2).

Kenig, O. (2009). Democratization of party leadership selection: Do wider selectorates produce more competitive contests?. Electoral Studies, 28(2), 240-247.

Kitschelt, H., & Wilkinson, S. I. (2007). Patrons, clients and policies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Lewis, B. D. (2020). Local government spending and service delivery in Indonesia: The political economy of decentralization. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50(3), 426–448. https://doi.org/10.1080/00472336.2019.1627746

Lewis, B. D. (2020). Local government spending and service delivery in Indonesia. Journal of Contemporary Asia, 50(3), 426–448.

Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Morgan, D. L. (1997). Focus groups as qualitative research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Muhtadi, B. (2019). Vote buying in Indonesia: The mechanics of electoral bribery. Cham: Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-15954-6

Lowndes, V., & Leach, S. (2004). Understanding local political leadership: constitutions, contexts and capabilities. Local Government Studies, 30(4), 557-575.

Niedzwiecki, S., & Stoyan, A. T. (2018). Decentralization and democratic participation: The effect of subnational self-rule on voting in Latin America and the Caribbean. Electoral Studies. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2017.12.001

Norris, P. (2014). Why electoral integrity matters. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ostwald, K., Tajima, Y., & Samphantharak, K. (2016). Indonesia's decentralization experiment: Motivations, successes, and unintended consequences. Journal of Southeast Asian Economies (JSEAE), 33(2), 139-156.

Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Piattoni, S. (2001). Clientelism, interests, and democratic representation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Schakel, A. H., & Romanova, V. (2022). Regional assemblies and executives, regional authority, and the strategic manipulation of regional elections in electoral autocracies. Regional & Federal Studies, 32(4), 413-435.

Sobari, W. (2014). Patronage Driven Democracy: Narratives of Survival and Failure of District Heads in the Emerging Democratic Indonesia (A Case Study in Four Rural and Urban Districts in East Java, Indonesia) (Doctoral dissertation, The Flinders University of South Australia).

Triantini, Z. E., Aspinall, E., & Sukmajati, M. (2017). Brokers, money, and the personalization of electoral politics in Indonesia. Journal of Current Southeast Asian Affairs, 36(1), 109–134. https://doi.org/10.1177/186810341703600105.

Published

2026-03-27

Issue

Section

Articles